A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, request to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their preparing permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such parts are subject to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because become emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website became Probably the most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of steps had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been covered in detail via the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as readers sought to grasp the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
In the core of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few only wanting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Expert tips and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline along with the symbolic mother nature of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other long once the authorized prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong past that handle. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.